After a seemingly endless road to the Stanley Cup the Canucks now go into Boston just one win away from the biggest moment in Vancouver history. Yes, bigger than any moment of the Olympics. While it is a great position to be in, it's not a very comfortable position. I found it quite amusing that the ridiculously biased Boston media basically wrote off the Canucks chances with the series 2-2. Now that it's 3-2 Canucks they are not quite so arrogant. The reality is that this series still could go either way.
You really have to admire the sports fans in Boston. They truly are hardcore. They seem to have to hate their opponents, in any sport. It's pretty bad when Canuck fans in Boston are afraid to wear their Canuck jerseys. The Canucks have had a few major rivalries over the years and while I don't particularly like some of the teams, I have the utmost respect and appreciation for Iginla, Kiprusoff, Hall, Eberle, Toews and Keith. I'm a fan of hockey first and foremost. Being a fan of the Canucks is a very close second.
I want to see exciting, highly skilled hockey. I don't need to see a lot of goals, but I'd like to see a lot of chances and some great goaltending. If you like that kind of hockey, how can you not like the Canucks? Do people hate playing against Ryan Kesler? Yup. But if you want to be a contending team then you need people on your team that aren't that fun to play against. How about those Sedins? (Give me a break with the sisters comments.) Their skill level is off the charts. When they are healthy they are elite players. I think it is shameful that the refs aren't calling the games as they should be called which would allow them to show the skill that they have. It makes the NHL look extremely bad. Although a lot of things make the NHL look bad.
I can also tell you without question that there is no Canuck player even close to as dirty as Corey Perry or Chris Pronger. Those two are often seen as heros. Don't get me wrong, they are great players. But they are cheap shot artists. Aaron Rome is about as honest a player as you will get. And now he's suddenly hockey's equivalent to Charles Manson?
And Alex Burrows? Well, how dare he (allegedly) chomp down on a gloved finger when it is forced into his mouth??!! How is he not banned for life? Seriously though, I'm really not sure how the NHL could've suspended him for that. The only 2 people who could possibly know if he really did bite down are Burrows and Bergeron. Still, the whining continued.
Roberto Luongo? Wow! There's a BIG story. Saying that he would've made the save on Lapierre because he plays in the paint? And then also saying that 'THERE ARE SOME SAVES THAT THOMAS WOULD MAKE THAT I WOULDN'T.' And the Boston media thinks this is a story? How is saying that 'their goalie would make saves that I wouldn't' arrogant? It is writers like those in Boston that are responsible for all the 'they are a great team, we will just try our best' and 'we'll just take it one shift at a time' and 'our backs are to the wall' quotes that put everyone to sleep. Can we not all agree that BOTH of these goalies have been great? They both play completely different styles, but it is working for both of them. It is also extremely likely that one of them will win the Conn Smythe Trophy. I think that if Roberto comes up huge in Boston and the Canucks win, he should win it. If it goes to 7 then maybe give it to Thomas even if Boston loses that final game. As good as Thomas has been in this series, he has yet to steal a game. I wouldn't say Roberto has necessarily stolen games, but he does have 2 shutouts.
I'm expecting a great game 6. The Bruins will be fired up with the Cup on the line. They especially don't want the Canucks parading the Cup around their building. The Canucks of course know that they just need to win one more. That should be incentive enough for them to put their best game on the ice. I hope the Canucks can weather an early storm and I would be surprised to see them get any power plays. A game in Boston where the Bruins could be eliminated, which would give the Cup to a Western Canadian team? I'm thinking no power plays.
I have a good feeling. I think Roberto is going to get the job done. It would be nice (for my heart at least) if we blew the Bruins away. But that's never really been the way the Canucks do things. It's always been a difficult road. That last game we couldn't relax for a second, and I don't expect game 6 to be any different. Either way I will be holding my breath, watching through trembling fingers, with my '94 White Hot towel in hand and Champagne chilling in the fridge, just waiting to be opened. Get 'er done boys!
Monday, June 13, 2011
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
The 'Villains' Look To Regain Control Of Series
If there wasn't a Boston-Vancouver rivalry before, I think it's safe to say we have one now. I find it quite laughable that the Canucks are now looked upon as the bad guys. I realize that most Americans are somewhat new to Hockey, but you don't have to be Scotty Bowman to see what's happening out there on the ice. (To you Americans, he's widely regarded as the Einstein of Hockey, winning several Cups with Montreal and Detroit) The simple fact is that Boston CANNOT win this series unless they take it into the trenches, the back alleys, the boxing ring. Pick your metaphor. The Bruins do not have enough skilled players to be able to compete with the Sedins or the speed to keep up with Raymond, Hansen and Kesler (when he's healthy). In other words, if Zdeno Chara does not turn into the second-coming of Ogie Oglethorpe (might want to Google that Bruins' fans), Henrik will be hoisting the Cup and Patrice Bergeron will be forever known as the guy who stuck his gloved hand into a player's mouth and then whined about getting bit.
If you watched Oglethorpe, excuse me Chara, in game 3 you would know what I am talking about. I wish I had recorded it so I could watch it back, but I think it's a pretty safe bet to say that there wasn't one shift that he took where he couldn't have gotten a penalty. If he doesn't hack, wack, slash, hold, grab, spear and punch the Sedins then the party is over. The fact that he isn't going to the box and feeling shame is just a bonus for Boston. That being said, if the Canucks don't get their power play back on track to at least try to keep the Bruins honest, then they are their own worst enemy. The bigger Vancouver's power play fails, the more liberties Boston are likely to take.
Wow. Two whole paragraphs and I haven't even brought up the Aaron Rome hit on Nathan Horton. For those of you that think it was an intent to injure, you are clearly delusional. The Canucks were up 2-0 in the series and looking to take a stranglehold. Do you really think early in the first period of game 3 that they would want any part of that? Not to mention that Aaron Rome is not and never has been that type of player. He was on the receiving end of a dirty hit against San Jose that gave him a concussion, no suspension on that play. (Had to throw that in there, sorry.) Was it a penalty? Yes. From the moment he passed off the puck to the moment of contact it was slightly less than one second. The NHL allows a half second. So it was late, no question. There are people in Boston calling Rome a 'felon' and that he'should never play again'. He didn't leave his feet, didn't target the head, and it obviously wasn't a blindside. Mike Murphy even said all of these things. What it really boils down to is two things. The fact that Horton was sent off on a stretcher and likely won't be back in this series, and the fact that Rome is not one of Vancouver's star players. If Kesler had hit Horton, or for that matter if Horton had hit Rome like that, there would be no suspension. I'm disappointed that Rome was given a suspension at all. But 4 games? 4 times more than any other player in Stanley Cup Final history? If I wasn't laughing so hard at the ridiculousness of the NHL in making this decision I would be outraged.
But now the NHL has painted itself into a corner. This is every hockey writer in Vancouver's wet dream (and probably the one writer in Boston that occasionally covers Hockey too!) But I'd guess that it's about to get better. That 4 game suspension will have caught the attention of every player in the NHL, and yes Boston players too. Even those fishing and golfing will have at least looked up the hit on Youtube. Because now there is a risk for every player in the league of being banished for a Stanley Cup final. Okay, let's be honest. Daniel and Henrik probably aren't going to attempt to stand a guy up at the blue line so they are probably okay. But virtually everyone else is in danger of being ejected from the SCF because they hit a guy less than a half second late. When I say that it's about to get better, I mean that there will likely be a much worse hit in this series and most likely from the Bruins. Let's say it's Chara or Lucic. Not too far-fetched I don't think. If it's the same hit or worse, will there be a suspension? Well, we will likely find out. But I wouldn't bet on it.
Did that hit on Horton cost Vancouver the game? Probably. The Canucks did kill the 5 minute penalty but going down to 5 defencemen that early in a game is tough. They beat Boston with 5 D in game one but they had Hamhuis and he makes a big difference. I think Alberts played half decent with the extra minutes but he's no Dan Hamhuis. I really don't care if the score was 2-1 or 8-1. It was a 4-0 game going into the 3rd and the Canucks were trying to get back into it. That's when you are likely to give up goals. No point sitting back and preserving a 4-0 loss. But it makes for a good story, and when you need to write a story a day about Hockey, then you go with it.
I was actually thinking about apologizing to AV for all the negative things I've said about him in the past (not until they win 2 more games however), but now I have to say he was outcoached in game 3. I think the third goal (the first short-handed goal) was the back-breaker, but they still had a minute left on their power play. Call a timeout and rest the 1st unit so they can stay out there. If they get that next goal a comeback is a possibility. As a coach you have to find a way to win. Joel Quenneville did just that in the first round and almost pulled the upset. As far as Luongo goes, (and don't get me wrong, I've always been a big supporter of Roberto) you don't ask him if he wants to come out. You are the coach. Once he sees Schneider heading his way he will come out. I'm not really concerned about him getting lit up for 8 goals, but it would give Schneider a bit of work. You know if Luongo plays lights out again, which I expect, then he is likely to get run over 'accidentally' by one of those Bruins. We may still need Schneider at some point before all is said and done.
So how does Vancouver turn this around and go home with a chance to wrap it up? They need to get back to playing their style of Hockey. I hear the ice in Boston is horrible, which favors the less-skilled, slower Bruin team, so they will have to fight through that. They need to move the puck on their power play and they need to find a way to beat Boston's best penalty killer, Thomas. I imagine Vigneault saw this Boston freight train coming. Why try to get in front of it? Let it pass and concentrate on playing hockey like the villains we are, and that baby is going to derail.
If you watched Oglethorpe, excuse me Chara, in game 3 you would know what I am talking about. I wish I had recorded it so I could watch it back, but I think it's a pretty safe bet to say that there wasn't one shift that he took where he couldn't have gotten a penalty. If he doesn't hack, wack, slash, hold, grab, spear and punch the Sedins then the party is over. The fact that he isn't going to the box and feeling shame is just a bonus for Boston. That being said, if the Canucks don't get their power play back on track to at least try to keep the Bruins honest, then they are their own worst enemy. The bigger Vancouver's power play fails, the more liberties Boston are likely to take.
Wow. Two whole paragraphs and I haven't even brought up the Aaron Rome hit on Nathan Horton. For those of you that think it was an intent to injure, you are clearly delusional. The Canucks were up 2-0 in the series and looking to take a stranglehold. Do you really think early in the first period of game 3 that they would want any part of that? Not to mention that Aaron Rome is not and never has been that type of player. He was on the receiving end of a dirty hit against San Jose that gave him a concussion, no suspension on that play. (Had to throw that in there, sorry.) Was it a penalty? Yes. From the moment he passed off the puck to the moment of contact it was slightly less than one second. The NHL allows a half second. So it was late, no question. There are people in Boston calling Rome a 'felon' and that he'should never play again'. He didn't leave his feet, didn't target the head, and it obviously wasn't a blindside. Mike Murphy even said all of these things. What it really boils down to is two things. The fact that Horton was sent off on a stretcher and likely won't be back in this series, and the fact that Rome is not one of Vancouver's star players. If Kesler had hit Horton, or for that matter if Horton had hit Rome like that, there would be no suspension. I'm disappointed that Rome was given a suspension at all. But 4 games? 4 times more than any other player in Stanley Cup Final history? If I wasn't laughing so hard at the ridiculousness of the NHL in making this decision I would be outraged.
But now the NHL has painted itself into a corner. This is every hockey writer in Vancouver's wet dream (and probably the one writer in Boston that occasionally covers Hockey too!) But I'd guess that it's about to get better. That 4 game suspension will have caught the attention of every player in the NHL, and yes Boston players too. Even those fishing and golfing will have at least looked up the hit on Youtube. Because now there is a risk for every player in the league of being banished for a Stanley Cup final. Okay, let's be honest. Daniel and Henrik probably aren't going to attempt to stand a guy up at the blue line so they are probably okay. But virtually everyone else is in danger of being ejected from the SCF because they hit a guy less than a half second late. When I say that it's about to get better, I mean that there will likely be a much worse hit in this series and most likely from the Bruins. Let's say it's Chara or Lucic. Not too far-fetched I don't think. If it's the same hit or worse, will there be a suspension? Well, we will likely find out. But I wouldn't bet on it.
Did that hit on Horton cost Vancouver the game? Probably. The Canucks did kill the 5 minute penalty but going down to 5 defencemen that early in a game is tough. They beat Boston with 5 D in game one but they had Hamhuis and he makes a big difference. I think Alberts played half decent with the extra minutes but he's no Dan Hamhuis. I really don't care if the score was 2-1 or 8-1. It was a 4-0 game going into the 3rd and the Canucks were trying to get back into it. That's when you are likely to give up goals. No point sitting back and preserving a 4-0 loss. But it makes for a good story, and when you need to write a story a day about Hockey, then you go with it.
I was actually thinking about apologizing to AV for all the negative things I've said about him in the past (not until they win 2 more games however), but now I have to say he was outcoached in game 3. I think the third goal (the first short-handed goal) was the back-breaker, but they still had a minute left on their power play. Call a timeout and rest the 1st unit so they can stay out there. If they get that next goal a comeback is a possibility. As a coach you have to find a way to win. Joel Quenneville did just that in the first round and almost pulled the upset. As far as Luongo goes, (and don't get me wrong, I've always been a big supporter of Roberto) you don't ask him if he wants to come out. You are the coach. Once he sees Schneider heading his way he will come out. I'm not really concerned about him getting lit up for 8 goals, but it would give Schneider a bit of work. You know if Luongo plays lights out again, which I expect, then he is likely to get run over 'accidentally' by one of those Bruins. We may still need Schneider at some point before all is said and done.
So how does Vancouver turn this around and go home with a chance to wrap it up? They need to get back to playing their style of Hockey. I hear the ice in Boston is horrible, which favors the less-skilled, slower Bruin team, so they will have to fight through that. They need to move the puck on their power play and they need to find a way to beat Boston's best penalty killer, Thomas. I imagine Vigneault saw this Boston freight train coming. Why try to get in front of it? Let it pass and concentrate on playing hockey like the villains we are, and that baby is going to derail.
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Sharks Squeak Back Into Series
The Sharks began game 3 like a team possessed. They put the Canucks on their heels from the opening faceoff and won puck battles all over the ice. Their top 6 forwards played like the players that they are. Even goalie Antti Niemi was spectacular when he needed to be. Add to that the fact that the Canucks were average at best in their own end for the first 40 minutes and that the refs followed Gary Bettman's orders (allegedly) and gave the Sharks 10 PP's. On top of all that Ehrhoff got injured late in the first putting the Canucks down to 5 D and then in the 3rd Aaron Rome was knocked out of the game on a hit from behind leaving the Canucks down to 4 D. Add it all up and it sounds like a blowout doesn't it? It sounds like one of those games where us Canucks' fans have to hide our head in shame, or perhaps avoid going out in public for a few days. The fact that the final score was 4-3 for the Sharks should have San Jose fans crapping their britches. (Maybe that should've been my headline: 'Sharks Fans Should Be Crapping Their Britches'). It had to be an absolutely perfect storm for the Sharks to win, and they still barely eked it out, with a little help from the refs on a phantom Bieksa hooking penalty.
I have been very impressed with Vancouver's resilience in the playoffs thus far. Their goal is to win hockey games and play whistle-to-whistle. They know they will not go 16-0, although for my blood pressure's sake I wish they would. This team has been great at not getting too high or too low. That's all about leadership. Some of the credit has to go to Mike Gillis. Just think how the Canucks would be doing right now if Malhotra was healthy. They would be heavy favorites to drink from the silver chalice. (Hey, I kinda like the sound of that.)
Once again the Luongo haters have come out in full force. I don't know what it is about Vancouver fans. For 40 years they have bitched about goaltending. Luongo is the best goalie the Canucks have ever had. Goalies, like the rest of the team, aren't perfect. The good news is that if the rest of the team plays to their capabilities Luongo doesn't have to be perfect. I think he made numerous great saves in game 3. I would have to watch the game over again sober to count them all but I'd say over 10. If I was to criticize him for one goal it would be the 4-1 goal that I thought was the backbreaker. As it turned out the real backbreaker was the final buzzer. For those of you bitching about his salary, it's completely irrelevant. He's not going to make a glove save on the great breakaway shot by Marleau just because he's making $10 mill this year. The fact is that nobody works harder and nobody wants to win more than Roberto. I think he wants it so bad that he can't relax and have fun sometimes. Even at that level, you play better when you are relaxed and enjoying playing. In any sport.
I was a little disappointed that Vigneault changed his lineup in game 3. After winning relatively easily in the first 2 games, I wouldn't have changed a thing. I think it shows confidence in your team if you stick with the same lineup no matter who SJ is going to add to their lineup or how they may approach the next game. The only time I would change my lineup after winning 2 consecutive games convincingly is if I have injuries. That's it.
So now it's the Canucks turn to bounce back. The games just get bigger and bigger. It's either 2-2 or 3-1 heading back to Vancouver. I'd bet that Alberts and Ballard are in for Ehrhoff and Rome and that, for San Jose, Couture doesn't play. I expect the Canucks to play with the same discipline as in game 3. I don't think they lost their composure at all. I expect them to play a full 60 minutes like they did in the first 2 games and Ryan Kesler will be more of a force if he's not killing penalties the whole game. If they play to their potential then they will win even if Luongo lets in another stinker. The Canucks are clearly the superior team and I don't think the Sharks will be able to stop them. I think Sundays game (noon, I guess I'll have to set my alarm) will be the last game played in San Jose this year.
I have been very impressed with Vancouver's resilience in the playoffs thus far. Their goal is to win hockey games and play whistle-to-whistle. They know they will not go 16-0, although for my blood pressure's sake I wish they would. This team has been great at not getting too high or too low. That's all about leadership. Some of the credit has to go to Mike Gillis. Just think how the Canucks would be doing right now if Malhotra was healthy. They would be heavy favorites to drink from the silver chalice. (Hey, I kinda like the sound of that.)
Once again the Luongo haters have come out in full force. I don't know what it is about Vancouver fans. For 40 years they have bitched about goaltending. Luongo is the best goalie the Canucks have ever had. Goalies, like the rest of the team, aren't perfect. The good news is that if the rest of the team plays to their capabilities Luongo doesn't have to be perfect. I think he made numerous great saves in game 3. I would have to watch the game over again sober to count them all but I'd say over 10. If I was to criticize him for one goal it would be the 4-1 goal that I thought was the backbreaker. As it turned out the real backbreaker was the final buzzer. For those of you bitching about his salary, it's completely irrelevant. He's not going to make a glove save on the great breakaway shot by Marleau just because he's making $10 mill this year. The fact is that nobody works harder and nobody wants to win more than Roberto. I think he wants it so bad that he can't relax and have fun sometimes. Even at that level, you play better when you are relaxed and enjoying playing. In any sport.
I was a little disappointed that Vigneault changed his lineup in game 3. After winning relatively easily in the first 2 games, I wouldn't have changed a thing. I think it shows confidence in your team if you stick with the same lineup no matter who SJ is going to add to their lineup or how they may approach the next game. The only time I would change my lineup after winning 2 consecutive games convincingly is if I have injuries. That's it.
So now it's the Canucks turn to bounce back. The games just get bigger and bigger. It's either 2-2 or 3-1 heading back to Vancouver. I'd bet that Alberts and Ballard are in for Ehrhoff and Rome and that, for San Jose, Couture doesn't play. I expect the Canucks to play with the same discipline as in game 3. I don't think they lost their composure at all. I expect them to play a full 60 minutes like they did in the first 2 games and Ryan Kesler will be more of a force if he's not killing penalties the whole game. If they play to their potential then they will win even if Luongo lets in another stinker. The Canucks are clearly the superior team and I don't think the Sharks will be able to stop them. I think Sundays game (noon, I guess I'll have to set my alarm) will be the last game played in San Jose this year.
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Canucks Remain Focused While Viewers Fight Boredom
Well you knew it had to happen. After an epic opening round series against the Blackhawks, you knew there was going to be a letdown for the Canuck fans and the viewers across the country. It's kind of like watching the brilliant opening scene of Raiders Of The Lost Ark and then waiting patiently, frustratingly for a scene to match that one. Luckily, however, the Canucks themselves didn't suffer from a letdown. Far from it. They kept their work ethic at a high level and stuck to their game plan. And I was able to comfortably watch the game without hyperventilating.
I don't expect this to be an easy series. While Nashville and Vancouver aren't known for a rivalry, the Preds are a solid team and they are well coached. I hate to think what Barry Trotz could do with this team if he had a few superstar forwards. They are solid on their back end and have Vezina nominee Pekka Rinne in goal. If the first game is any indication, the Canucks could theoretically win this series and only score 4 goals. I'm guessing that's probably never happened before. Right now I'm a little worried that they may never score another goal this series and lose in 5. I'm guessing that's never happened before either. That just goes to show you just how good Rinne was in game 1.
CBC never seems to give the Canucks much credit. Ron McLean and crew just bitched about how boring the game was. The Canucks can only do so much. It's up to the Predators to push back. I'm getting sick and tired of Craig Simpson only talking about the missed calls on what he thinks should be Canuck infractions, and only showing those replays. I don't want a color guy who is simply a Canuck cheerleader, but a little objectivity would be nice. I'm guessing that he probably didn't like all the whining about penalties in the 1st round and all the conspiracy talk so now he's trying to show Canuck fans that it's not really that one-sided. In game 1 I don't think the reffing determined the outcome of the game but I just think that it was bad in general.
I think the reffing has been bad in most of the games I've watched in the Playoffs so far. I'm not really sure how to fix it. I realize it's a very difficult sport to officiate but is it any better with 2 refs than it was when there was only 1? You would think that it should be a lot better, but I'm not convinced that it is. There needs to be consistency at least within each game, if not the league in general. For example, if they call an early questionable slashing penalty on one team, then they should be calling legitimate slashing penalties for the rest of the game. Conspiracy? Truthfully, I don't think the reffing is near good enough to be able to conspire to anything.
Does anybody else have a problem with the 6pm PDT start times for the home games or is it just me? The Canucks won the President's Trophy. They fought hard all season long (okay, not ALL season long I forgot about those back-to-back Oiler losses) to enjoy home ice advantage for as far as they go. I may be nit-picking a little but moving the start time up an hour is slightly less of an advantage to the home team. Players have their routines. Their afternoon naps, their pre-game meals. Okay so maybe it's not a big disadvantage, but if the change was only so that CBC has more viewers back East then I have a problem with it. I feel sorry for the working fans that have to try to get to the game on time, but I'm sure Gary Bettman wouldn't be too concerned. They are probably all Canadian.
Game 2 goes tonight. I would expect to see a different Nashville team in this one. Coach Trotz wasn't very happy about that last game and likely let his troops know it. The Canucks need to keep up their solid team defense and work for their chances. Getting in front of Rinne might be a good idea as well. Let's not allow him to get too comfortable. And please, for the love of all things Holy, let's get that first goal, because if we don't, I'm going to need to start drinking Red Bull by the case just to stay awake.
I don't expect this to be an easy series. While Nashville and Vancouver aren't known for a rivalry, the Preds are a solid team and they are well coached. I hate to think what Barry Trotz could do with this team if he had a few superstar forwards. They are solid on their back end and have Vezina nominee Pekka Rinne in goal. If the first game is any indication, the Canucks could theoretically win this series and only score 4 goals. I'm guessing that's probably never happened before. Right now I'm a little worried that they may never score another goal this series and lose in 5. I'm guessing that's never happened before either. That just goes to show you just how good Rinne was in game 1.
CBC never seems to give the Canucks much credit. Ron McLean and crew just bitched about how boring the game was. The Canucks can only do so much. It's up to the Predators to push back. I'm getting sick and tired of Craig Simpson only talking about the missed calls on what he thinks should be Canuck infractions, and only showing those replays. I don't want a color guy who is simply a Canuck cheerleader, but a little objectivity would be nice. I'm guessing that he probably didn't like all the whining about penalties in the 1st round and all the conspiracy talk so now he's trying to show Canuck fans that it's not really that one-sided. In game 1 I don't think the reffing determined the outcome of the game but I just think that it was bad in general.
I think the reffing has been bad in most of the games I've watched in the Playoffs so far. I'm not really sure how to fix it. I realize it's a very difficult sport to officiate but is it any better with 2 refs than it was when there was only 1? You would think that it should be a lot better, but I'm not convinced that it is. There needs to be consistency at least within each game, if not the league in general. For example, if they call an early questionable slashing penalty on one team, then they should be calling legitimate slashing penalties for the rest of the game. Conspiracy? Truthfully, I don't think the reffing is near good enough to be able to conspire to anything.
Does anybody else have a problem with the 6pm PDT start times for the home games or is it just me? The Canucks won the President's Trophy. They fought hard all season long (okay, not ALL season long I forgot about those back-to-back Oiler losses) to enjoy home ice advantage for as far as they go. I may be nit-picking a little but moving the start time up an hour is slightly less of an advantage to the home team. Players have their routines. Their afternoon naps, their pre-game meals. Okay so maybe it's not a big disadvantage, but if the change was only so that CBC has more viewers back East then I have a problem with it. I feel sorry for the working fans that have to try to get to the game on time, but I'm sure Gary Bettman wouldn't be too concerned. They are probably all Canadian.
Game 2 goes tonight. I would expect to see a different Nashville team in this one. Coach Trotz wasn't very happy about that last game and likely let his troops know it. The Canucks need to keep up their solid team defense and work for their chances. Getting in front of Rinne might be a good idea as well. Let's not allow him to get too comfortable. And please, for the love of all things Holy, let's get that first goal, because if we don't, I'm going to need to start drinking Red Bull by the case just to stay awake.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Buh Bye Demons
Forget about the Sidney Crosby goal in the Olympics. 'The Goal' at GM Arena (sorry Rogers Place, okay, whatever), is now Alex Burrows' in game 7 OT against the Blackhawks. In what will go down in History as one of the most intense games in the Canucks 40 years, their 2-1 victory allowed them to exorcise the demons, or as John Shorthouse said in his great call of the goal, slay the dragon.
Does anybody else feel like they actually played this game? I think I was more tired than most of the players and I probably looked worse than Raffi Torres when all was said and done. I actually intended to write this immediately after the game but I had to go to the ER for an IV due to too much stress and dehydration. (Okay, that's not true. Just trying to spice up my blog a little. You still awake?) Why wouldn't I cut it as a sports journalist? Well, I don't have time or space to list the reasons on here, but one of them would be that I always seem to be about 2 days late with my blogs. Incidentally, I'll be posting my round 1 NHL predictions tomorrow.
I told myself I was no longer going to be superstitious. I didn't wear my Canucks jersey or bring out any flags for the first 3 games of this series. I wore my Canucks jersey and put flags on my car for games 4, and stubbornly once again for game 5. Then for game 6 I went with my autographed Canuck t-shirt and they got back to playing their game. Luckily I went with the same t-shirt for game 7. So much for not being superstitious. (Incidentally my t-shirt has Daniel, Burrows, Kesler and Malhotra autographs among a few other Canucks, BUT it also has Shane O'briens's. So not sure what to do now.)
Game 7 featured just an amazing effort from the player who clearly should be captain of this team. Ryan Kesler was a man possessed. He gave everything he had and I fully expect to see some Kesler jerseys throughout North America in the years to come. He was that good. Since Manny's unfortunate and tragic eye injury, Kesler had to step into that defensive center role. It's not really fair to bitch about his numbers. Funny how everyone just looks at the stats to determine if someone is playing well or not. You can't judge his performance in game 7 by looking at the numbers. Well, unless you want to look at Jonathan Toews production or plus-minus.
The guy who will go down in History as the real hero in this game of course will be Alex Burrows. Fitting too, as he is probably the classiest Canuck. He signed autographs for a long time in Penticton during training camp and when there were no more to sign he asked if there were any others, looked around and when he saw that there weren't he then said goodbye and walked into the dressing room. He also talked to the fans and answered their questions. Now that's classy, although I'm sure Ron Mclean woudn't think so. While Burrows was the man, scoring the first Canuck goal on an awesome set up by Kesler, and finishing things off with a great, opportunistic individual effort in the OT, he also made some costly mistakes. He had the puck stolen from him in the neutral zone late in the 3rd while on the power play, leading to the tying goal by Toews. He needed to play safe, smart hockey there and dump the puck in. He also took the penalty in OT which the Canucks luckily were able to kill thanks in part to a solid save by Luongo off of a Patrick Sharp one-timer in close. But regardless of that, he was the one to finish off the Hawks and for that he is a hero in Vancouver and rightly so.
When 'the goal' went in I jumped around my house waving my '94 White Hot Canuck towel for what seemed like forever. It was 'the' Olympic goal, times 10. (Incidentally, I'm now out day-to-day with a groin pull, a charley horse and a bruised spleen.) Did I enjoy the whole experience? Nope. It was painful to watch. PAINFUL. Looking back it was an amazing hockey game. This is the way hockey was meant to be played. (That's why I hate watching Minnesota and Columbus and often Nashville as well.) We came within an eyelash of disaster. I felt like we were on the Titanic and by some miracle just barely steered clear of the ice berg.
Another hero on this night was the man that couldn't have possibly faced any more pressure than he did. In fact, I don't know how he wasn't crushed by the tidal wave of pressure on him while he stood there for the National Anthems. Roberto Luongo stood his ground and was solid, and at times great. He didn't need to be spectacular because when the Canucks are playing THEIR game, he rarely ever has to be. It was a game that he couldn't relax for a second. We never did get that 2 or 3 goal lead. But still he battled and battled some more. He fought the puck a few times but his D were right where they should be to help him out. And then when the shot fired out from the grassy knoll (okay it was Toews on his stomach in the slot), and my heart felt like it was going to explode, Roberto didn't fall apart. That's the stuff champions are made of. Canuck fans will NEVER EVER be able to agree on who should have played game 6 or even game 7 for that matter. There is the Luongo camp and the Schneider camp. (It's kind of like trying to debate which one is more feminine, Donny or Marie. It's a waste of time, we will never agree.) I'm in the Luongo camp but I can certainly see both sides. I think the team as a whole is better because Luongo was in net when they were able to 'slay the dragon' and not Schneider. And for the people bitching about the rebound Luongo gave up on the Toews goal, (and even asking why Roberto was on his stomach in OT in game 6, you do realize the original shot was deflected right?) you can all give your head a shake. If the Canucks get by Nashville you can expect Luongo to have issues again at some point. It's the NHL playoffs. There is a reason the Stanley Cup is the most difficult trophy to win. There may even be a time when Cory Schneider gets another start. We'll see. But calling out Luongo when there are almost always 2 or 3 miscues by his team before the puck even gets to him, doesn't really help matters. Heaping on the pressure doesn't really make things easier for him. And incidentally, calling him Loosongo isn't really very funny. Or original. There. I said it.
Other Canucks that deserve mention for their great play in game 7 are Edler and Hamhuis, both played amazing D, the Higgins, Lappierre and Hansen line was a force, especially in the second period, and Ballard played solid after being a healthy (?) scratch for the previous 2 games. If Ballard was indeed healthy I have to question the decision not to play him. And I'll go even further. The decision to play Alberts over Ballard was the reason they lost game 6. Salo was out after 4 shifts and didn't return and the Canucks were down to 5 D early. It was Alberts first game in over 2 months and he was out there when the overtime goal was scored. That seemingly small decision almost cost Alain Vigneault his job.
It wouldn't be fair of me to talk about game 7 without giving credit to those lowly, no-good, oughta be tossed out of the league Chicago Blackhawks. Hey, after the misery they have bestowed on us Canuck fans, how could I possibly like them? The biggest credit of all has to go to their rookie goalie Corey Crawford. I clearly didn't give him enough credit going into this series. He played great all series long and in game 7, when it mattered most and the pressure was at its peak, he was simply spectacular. There is no more pressure for a goalie than when they are down a goal. The Hawks were down by 1 for almost the entire 3 periods and he kept his team in the game. It looks like he's going to be a star in this league for a long time to come.
I will also give credit to Pentictonite Duncan Keith. The whole Chicago team has had a tough season. They've played a lot of tough hockey, struggling just to make the playoffs. Keith played a lot of minutes all season and was clearly worn down heading into this series. He likely has a few injuries as well. But something happened in game 4 with the score tied 1-1. He was the one that seemed to ignite this team. (The weak too-many-men call and missed off-side helped too. Sorry, had to throw that in there.) He then seemed to carry the team on his back for games 4 and 5. He's a great player, he did all he could, and it was almost enough.
Jonathan Toews battled Kesler head-to-head for most of the series. It's fair to say that Kesler won that battle, but Toews was also exhausted and beat up heading into the series. I've heard that he has issues with both shoulders. He's a great Canadian hockey player and found a way to take his team into OT in game 7 against the President's Trophy winning Canucks. (I know, I know. The President's Trophy and $10 will buy you a small coffee at Starbucks.) I would hope that all Hawk fans are proud of the entire team. They battled hard all year after losing a lot of their depth players from last years Cup winning team. They played a lot better than I thought was possible.
Now the Canucks move on. Funny how all the other teams get at least 2 days rest. Conspiracy? I don't know. I think it's just that Bettman doesn't like Canadian teams. If Montreal had beaten the Bruins in game 7 last night, they'd probably be playing tonight too. So does Vancouver phone this one in? Are they still flying high over their huge win on Tuesday and unprepared? Or do they just continue where they left off? We'll find out very soon but I'm thinking that now that they've finally gotten the monkey off their backs, they will start to soar. (Because clearly you can't soar with a monkey on your back.) Just don't expect a wide open end to end, entertaining series like the last one. I expect it to be tight checking. We will probably see a lot of 1-0, 2-1 games. The Canucks need to play their best every game and if all goes well they will earn themselves a rest when this series is over. Because if they don't play their game, they will earn themselves a very long rest.
Does anybody else feel like they actually played this game? I think I was more tired than most of the players and I probably looked worse than Raffi Torres when all was said and done. I actually intended to write this immediately after the game but I had to go to the ER for an IV due to too much stress and dehydration. (Okay, that's not true. Just trying to spice up my blog a little. You still awake?) Why wouldn't I cut it as a sports journalist? Well, I don't have time or space to list the reasons on here, but one of them would be that I always seem to be about 2 days late with my blogs. Incidentally, I'll be posting my round 1 NHL predictions tomorrow.
I told myself I was no longer going to be superstitious. I didn't wear my Canucks jersey or bring out any flags for the first 3 games of this series. I wore my Canucks jersey and put flags on my car for games 4, and stubbornly once again for game 5. Then for game 6 I went with my autographed Canuck t-shirt and they got back to playing their game. Luckily I went with the same t-shirt for game 7. So much for not being superstitious. (Incidentally my t-shirt has Daniel, Burrows, Kesler and Malhotra autographs among a few other Canucks, BUT it also has Shane O'briens's. So not sure what to do now.)
Game 7 featured just an amazing effort from the player who clearly should be captain of this team. Ryan Kesler was a man possessed. He gave everything he had and I fully expect to see some Kesler jerseys throughout North America in the years to come. He was that good. Since Manny's unfortunate and tragic eye injury, Kesler had to step into that defensive center role. It's not really fair to bitch about his numbers. Funny how everyone just looks at the stats to determine if someone is playing well or not. You can't judge his performance in game 7 by looking at the numbers. Well, unless you want to look at Jonathan Toews production or plus-minus.
The guy who will go down in History as the real hero in this game of course will be Alex Burrows. Fitting too, as he is probably the classiest Canuck. He signed autographs for a long time in Penticton during training camp and when there were no more to sign he asked if there were any others, looked around and when he saw that there weren't he then said goodbye and walked into the dressing room. He also talked to the fans and answered their questions. Now that's classy, although I'm sure Ron Mclean woudn't think so. While Burrows was the man, scoring the first Canuck goal on an awesome set up by Kesler, and finishing things off with a great, opportunistic individual effort in the OT, he also made some costly mistakes. He had the puck stolen from him in the neutral zone late in the 3rd while on the power play, leading to the tying goal by Toews. He needed to play safe, smart hockey there and dump the puck in. He also took the penalty in OT which the Canucks luckily were able to kill thanks in part to a solid save by Luongo off of a Patrick Sharp one-timer in close. But regardless of that, he was the one to finish off the Hawks and for that he is a hero in Vancouver and rightly so.
When 'the goal' went in I jumped around my house waving my '94 White Hot Canuck towel for what seemed like forever. It was 'the' Olympic goal, times 10. (Incidentally, I'm now out day-to-day with a groin pull, a charley horse and a bruised spleen.) Did I enjoy the whole experience? Nope. It was painful to watch. PAINFUL. Looking back it was an amazing hockey game. This is the way hockey was meant to be played. (That's why I hate watching Minnesota and Columbus and often Nashville as well.) We came within an eyelash of disaster. I felt like we were on the Titanic and by some miracle just barely steered clear of the ice berg.
Another hero on this night was the man that couldn't have possibly faced any more pressure than he did. In fact, I don't know how he wasn't crushed by the tidal wave of pressure on him while he stood there for the National Anthems. Roberto Luongo stood his ground and was solid, and at times great. He didn't need to be spectacular because when the Canucks are playing THEIR game, he rarely ever has to be. It was a game that he couldn't relax for a second. We never did get that 2 or 3 goal lead. But still he battled and battled some more. He fought the puck a few times but his D were right where they should be to help him out. And then when the shot fired out from the grassy knoll (okay it was Toews on his stomach in the slot), and my heart felt like it was going to explode, Roberto didn't fall apart. That's the stuff champions are made of. Canuck fans will NEVER EVER be able to agree on who should have played game 6 or even game 7 for that matter. There is the Luongo camp and the Schneider camp. (It's kind of like trying to debate which one is more feminine, Donny or Marie. It's a waste of time, we will never agree.) I'm in the Luongo camp but I can certainly see both sides. I think the team as a whole is better because Luongo was in net when they were able to 'slay the dragon' and not Schneider. And for the people bitching about the rebound Luongo gave up on the Toews goal, (and even asking why Roberto was on his stomach in OT in game 6, you do realize the original shot was deflected right?) you can all give your head a shake. If the Canucks get by Nashville you can expect Luongo to have issues again at some point. It's the NHL playoffs. There is a reason the Stanley Cup is the most difficult trophy to win. There may even be a time when Cory Schneider gets another start. We'll see. But calling out Luongo when there are almost always 2 or 3 miscues by his team before the puck even gets to him, doesn't really help matters. Heaping on the pressure doesn't really make things easier for him. And incidentally, calling him Loosongo isn't really very funny. Or original. There. I said it.
Other Canucks that deserve mention for their great play in game 7 are Edler and Hamhuis, both played amazing D, the Higgins, Lappierre and Hansen line was a force, especially in the second period, and Ballard played solid after being a healthy (?) scratch for the previous 2 games. If Ballard was indeed healthy I have to question the decision not to play him. And I'll go even further. The decision to play Alberts over Ballard was the reason they lost game 6. Salo was out after 4 shifts and didn't return and the Canucks were down to 5 D early. It was Alberts first game in over 2 months and he was out there when the overtime goal was scored. That seemingly small decision almost cost Alain Vigneault his job.
It wouldn't be fair of me to talk about game 7 without giving credit to those lowly, no-good, oughta be tossed out of the league Chicago Blackhawks. Hey, after the misery they have bestowed on us Canuck fans, how could I possibly like them? The biggest credit of all has to go to their rookie goalie Corey Crawford. I clearly didn't give him enough credit going into this series. He played great all series long and in game 7, when it mattered most and the pressure was at its peak, he was simply spectacular. There is no more pressure for a goalie than when they are down a goal. The Hawks were down by 1 for almost the entire 3 periods and he kept his team in the game. It looks like he's going to be a star in this league for a long time to come.
I will also give credit to Pentictonite Duncan Keith. The whole Chicago team has had a tough season. They've played a lot of tough hockey, struggling just to make the playoffs. Keith played a lot of minutes all season and was clearly worn down heading into this series. He likely has a few injuries as well. But something happened in game 4 with the score tied 1-1. He was the one that seemed to ignite this team. (The weak too-many-men call and missed off-side helped too. Sorry, had to throw that in there.) He then seemed to carry the team on his back for games 4 and 5. He's a great player, he did all he could, and it was almost enough.
Jonathan Toews battled Kesler head-to-head for most of the series. It's fair to say that Kesler won that battle, but Toews was also exhausted and beat up heading into the series. I've heard that he has issues with both shoulders. He's a great Canadian hockey player and found a way to take his team into OT in game 7 against the President's Trophy winning Canucks. (I know, I know. The President's Trophy and $10 will buy you a small coffee at Starbucks.) I would hope that all Hawk fans are proud of the entire team. They battled hard all year after losing a lot of their depth players from last years Cup winning team. They played a lot better than I thought was possible.
Now the Canucks move on. Funny how all the other teams get at least 2 days rest. Conspiracy? I don't know. I think it's just that Bettman doesn't like Canadian teams. If Montreal had beaten the Bruins in game 7 last night, they'd probably be playing tonight too. So does Vancouver phone this one in? Are they still flying high over their huge win on Tuesday and unprepared? Or do they just continue where they left off? We'll find out very soon but I'm thinking that now that they've finally gotten the monkey off their backs, they will start to soar. (Because clearly you can't soar with a monkey on your back.) Just don't expect a wide open end to end, entertaining series like the last one. I expect it to be tight checking. We will probably see a lot of 1-0, 2-1 games. The Canucks need to play their best every game and if all goes well they will earn themselves a rest when this series is over. Because if they don't play their game, they will earn themselves a very long rest.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Time To Shine
It's time to throw history out the window. Forget about the past two seasons. Forget about losing 3 straight and facing the dire possibility of becoming only the 4th team in history to blow a 3-0 lead in the playoffs. Forget about winning the President's Trophy. Now, it's just about winning one game. It's about giving everything you have and finding a way to get it done.
This series has more than lived up to expectations. While games 3 and 4 were a letdown to even the most objective hockey fans (7-2 and 5-0 games aren't the most exciting to watch), game 6 had everything you could have asked for and more. It was intense, dramatic, controversial and exhausting. Well, I was exhausted anyways. Let's just say that sleep hasn't exactly been a friend of mine for the past week or so.
There is a huge goaltending debate in Vancouver that will probably go on for the foreseeable future. Schneider or Luongo? We can argue this forever and never agree. It's like abortion. Or capital punishment. Or whether Sarah Palin has the IQ of a stick or a rock. (I'm thinking rock incidentally.) Why has Vancouver been known as a goalie graveyard for 40 years? Well the fans accepting nothing but perfection would probably be one reason. So much pressure is being put on Luongo right now it's incredible. (And by the way, those of you saying 'he's making 10 mill this year he should be able to handle it!' don't understand that pressure doesn't have a price tag. Salaries don't mean anything in the playoffs.) Going into game 6 Luongo was 3-0 in games where his teammates have shown up. He played outstanding in 2 of those games. No he was not at his best in games 4 and 5 but how many goals would you consider to be bad goals? I would say only the first goal in game 5, but that's only off the top of my head. (And did I mention that I am sleep deprived?) While Cory Schneider played great in just over 2 periods in game 6, and raised his trade value in the process, I think it's fair to say that 2 of the goals he let in were worse than any the Luongo did. I think it was a mistake to start Schneider but then my entire family disagrees with me so what do I know? (Although I should point out that the only thing my Mother likes better than the Canucks is Vodka, so what does SHE know?) Anyways, the bottom line with this whole goalie debate is that it doesn't matter which goalie plays in net. If the Canucks play at the top of their game, we will win. There. Now wasn't that easy.
The other issue from game 6, and for most of the series in fact, has been the officiating. There is a lot of talk on CDC about NHL conspiracies. I have been quite outspoken about this on previous blogs. I try not to get too wrapped up in conspiracies in general but I do find them fascinating. I do believe in some conspiracies (911, JFK) and don't believe in others (moon landing hoax, Britney Spears singing live). I tend to think there isn't one in the NHL but I wouldn't completely rule it out. I think what is more likely is that the NHL wants to see each series go to 7 games. More revenue and overall much more exciting to watch. I haven't watched all the games from other series but I'd be willing to guess that once a team has won 3 games they have a lot of calls go against them. I've heard that Phoenix got favorable calls against Detroit (for obvious reasons) and I thought in the last LA-SJ game the Kings Doughty should've got a double minor late in the game and the charging penalty the Sharks took with just over 3 minutes left in the 3rd should've probably only gotten 2 minutes and not 5 and a game. Back to the Canucks-Hawks series, I don't think there's any question that the reffing played a significant role in getting Chicago back in this series. With the Canucks up 3-0 and tied 1-1 early in the 2nd period in a lifeless Chicago Arena, the Canucks received a phantom too-many-men call and just after it expired the same linesman that called the too-many-men missed the off-side that happened seconds before the go ahead Chicago goal. WIth the big momentum boost the Hawks then scored again 17 seconds later. So at that point it should still have been 1-1 and I really believe that if the Canucks were to get that next goal this series would have ended on that night. Instead it was 3-1 and the Canucks lost their way as they tried to climb back into the game.
While a lot of the calls and non-calls are debatable, you can't debate the penalty totals in this series. I don't really have a problem with the calls that went against the Canucks, but I have a real problem with what wasn't called on the Hawks, particularly the Scott punch to Burrows' face, the clearing the puck over the glass (it's not rocket science, pinpoint where the puck left the ice and where it landed, draw a straight line and you'll see that it went over the glass before landing on the bench), the hit on Bieksa in OT should have gotten a 2 min charge, but in my opinion did not warrant a suspension. There was also an obvious holding the stick, Hossa on Alberts mere seconds before the winning goal. No call. I think the penalty shot could have gone either way, but most likely if it had been Kesler on a breakaway and Seabrook did that there would have been a minor penalty on the play. I realize there were missed calls on the Canucks as well. I try to be as objective as possible. But you just can't deny the numbers. They don't lie. The Canucks have the best power play in the league and they haven't really been able to take advantage of that.
I'm glad that Mike Gillis spoke out to the media. Somebody had to say something. Vigneault doesn't ever seem to do anything but smile. I want a coach that will yell and scream when necessary. (And ONLY when necessary.) I firmly believe that if Vigneault was more like Quenneville or Babcock (a little more confrontational with his players) the Canucks would have shown up for game 5 and finished this series off. The team looked disinterested. The refs didn't even have to give the Hawks a helping hand in that game.
The other thing nobody seems to be talking about after game 6 was the fact that Salo got injured on his 4th shift of the game, and it was Andrew Alberts first game in over 2 months. I don't understand why Vigneault would play Alberts after 2 months off. He's not the fastest skater and if we get an injury to one of our D or the game goes into overtime then he'll have to play more minutes than you would like him to play. Both of those things happened and he was out there when the winning goal was scored in OT. A very curious decision from Alain Vigneault. It's almost like he's asking to be fired.
And that brings us to game 7. I really hope the Canuck players have slept better than I have. I hope they remember that games like these are what they dreamt of as kids. They need to play to win tonight and not like they are afraid to lose. All we can ask is that they leave everything on the ice. I fully expect the refs to let the players play. If the reffing is fair then you have to give the Canucks a decided edge. If the Canucks play like they did in game 6, and I expect them to play even better, then I really like our chances. Keep in mind that even though the Canucks have lost some big games in this series, game 7 will be their first must-win game. That will certainly be extra motivation. I look forward to seeing what this team is really capable of. I am also nervous as hell and will have trouble watching. We just need to find a way to win. Then the entire Province will explode, I will get some much needed sleep and Gary Bettman will have something to cry about. It's a win-win.
This series has more than lived up to expectations. While games 3 and 4 were a letdown to even the most objective hockey fans (7-2 and 5-0 games aren't the most exciting to watch), game 6 had everything you could have asked for and more. It was intense, dramatic, controversial and exhausting. Well, I was exhausted anyways. Let's just say that sleep hasn't exactly been a friend of mine for the past week or so.
There is a huge goaltending debate in Vancouver that will probably go on for the foreseeable future. Schneider or Luongo? We can argue this forever and never agree. It's like abortion. Or capital punishment. Or whether Sarah Palin has the IQ of a stick or a rock. (I'm thinking rock incidentally.) Why has Vancouver been known as a goalie graveyard for 40 years? Well the fans accepting nothing but perfection would probably be one reason. So much pressure is being put on Luongo right now it's incredible. (And by the way, those of you saying 'he's making 10 mill this year he should be able to handle it!' don't understand that pressure doesn't have a price tag. Salaries don't mean anything in the playoffs.) Going into game 6 Luongo was 3-0 in games where his teammates have shown up. He played outstanding in 2 of those games. No he was not at his best in games 4 and 5 but how many goals would you consider to be bad goals? I would say only the first goal in game 5, but that's only off the top of my head. (And did I mention that I am sleep deprived?) While Cory Schneider played great in just over 2 periods in game 6, and raised his trade value in the process, I think it's fair to say that 2 of the goals he let in were worse than any the Luongo did. I think it was a mistake to start Schneider but then my entire family disagrees with me so what do I know? (Although I should point out that the only thing my Mother likes better than the Canucks is Vodka, so what does SHE know?) Anyways, the bottom line with this whole goalie debate is that it doesn't matter which goalie plays in net. If the Canucks play at the top of their game, we will win. There. Now wasn't that easy.
The other issue from game 6, and for most of the series in fact, has been the officiating. There is a lot of talk on CDC about NHL conspiracies. I have been quite outspoken about this on previous blogs. I try not to get too wrapped up in conspiracies in general but I do find them fascinating. I do believe in some conspiracies (911, JFK) and don't believe in others (moon landing hoax, Britney Spears singing live). I tend to think there isn't one in the NHL but I wouldn't completely rule it out. I think what is more likely is that the NHL wants to see each series go to 7 games. More revenue and overall much more exciting to watch. I haven't watched all the games from other series but I'd be willing to guess that once a team has won 3 games they have a lot of calls go against them. I've heard that Phoenix got favorable calls against Detroit (for obvious reasons) and I thought in the last LA-SJ game the Kings Doughty should've got a double minor late in the game and the charging penalty the Sharks took with just over 3 minutes left in the 3rd should've probably only gotten 2 minutes and not 5 and a game. Back to the Canucks-Hawks series, I don't think there's any question that the reffing played a significant role in getting Chicago back in this series. With the Canucks up 3-0 and tied 1-1 early in the 2nd period in a lifeless Chicago Arena, the Canucks received a phantom too-many-men call and just after it expired the same linesman that called the too-many-men missed the off-side that happened seconds before the go ahead Chicago goal. WIth the big momentum boost the Hawks then scored again 17 seconds later. So at that point it should still have been 1-1 and I really believe that if the Canucks were to get that next goal this series would have ended on that night. Instead it was 3-1 and the Canucks lost their way as they tried to climb back into the game.
While a lot of the calls and non-calls are debatable, you can't debate the penalty totals in this series. I don't really have a problem with the calls that went against the Canucks, but I have a real problem with what wasn't called on the Hawks, particularly the Scott punch to Burrows' face, the clearing the puck over the glass (it's not rocket science, pinpoint where the puck left the ice and where it landed, draw a straight line and you'll see that it went over the glass before landing on the bench), the hit on Bieksa in OT should have gotten a 2 min charge, but in my opinion did not warrant a suspension. There was also an obvious holding the stick, Hossa on Alberts mere seconds before the winning goal. No call. I think the penalty shot could have gone either way, but most likely if it had been Kesler on a breakaway and Seabrook did that there would have been a minor penalty on the play. I realize there were missed calls on the Canucks as well. I try to be as objective as possible. But you just can't deny the numbers. They don't lie. The Canucks have the best power play in the league and they haven't really been able to take advantage of that.
I'm glad that Mike Gillis spoke out to the media. Somebody had to say something. Vigneault doesn't ever seem to do anything but smile. I want a coach that will yell and scream when necessary. (And ONLY when necessary.) I firmly believe that if Vigneault was more like Quenneville or Babcock (a little more confrontational with his players) the Canucks would have shown up for game 5 and finished this series off. The team looked disinterested. The refs didn't even have to give the Hawks a helping hand in that game.
The other thing nobody seems to be talking about after game 6 was the fact that Salo got injured on his 4th shift of the game, and it was Andrew Alberts first game in over 2 months. I don't understand why Vigneault would play Alberts after 2 months off. He's not the fastest skater and if we get an injury to one of our D or the game goes into overtime then he'll have to play more minutes than you would like him to play. Both of those things happened and he was out there when the winning goal was scored in OT. A very curious decision from Alain Vigneault. It's almost like he's asking to be fired.
And that brings us to game 7. I really hope the Canuck players have slept better than I have. I hope they remember that games like these are what they dreamt of as kids. They need to play to win tonight and not like they are afraid to lose. All we can ask is that they leave everything on the ice. I fully expect the refs to let the players play. If the reffing is fair then you have to give the Canucks a decided edge. If the Canucks play like they did in game 6, and I expect them to play even better, then I really like our chances. Keep in mind that even though the Canucks have lost some big games in this series, game 7 will be their first must-win game. That will certainly be extra motivation. I look forward to seeing what this team is really capable of. I am also nervous as hell and will have trouble watching. We just need to find a way to win. Then the entire Province will explode, I will get some much needed sleep and Gary Bettman will have something to cry about. It's a win-win.
Friday, April 22, 2011
Okay, Now You Can Panic
I know the road to the Stanley Cup is always a long journey, filled with peaks and valleys, disasters and moments of elation. But I didn't expect this journey to involve stepping on a land mine and then getting hit by an Atom bomb. I think that's about how most of us Canuck fans are feeling right now, and I didn't even fork out a few hundred dollars to have to sit in the Rog and have to witness this catastrophe.
Am I overstating things? Maybe slightly. The Canucks still have 2 more chances to wrap this series up. But generally speaking, this sort of thing doesn't happen to championship teams. The Canucks have completely gotten away from everything they did right in the Regular Season and the first 3 games of this series. Except for Roberto on occasion, nobody had to be spectacular. Now they are all playing an individual game. You win and you lose as a team. That's the way it's been since the beginning of time. Okay, the beginning of team sports. That's why a team like Pittsburgh, minus Crosby and Malkin, can still win games. That's how the '82 Canucks made it to the Stanley Cup final. It certainly wasn't because of talent. Maybe this Canuck squad should go back and watch some of those old tapes.
I had an uneasy feeling shortly before the first goal. Luongo likes to get some shots early and he hadn't had one to that point. He needs to make a save on that first goal. The team also needs to have a push-back shift after a goal so that they don't continue giving up 2 goals in 17 seconds or whatever it was. In fact, this team needs to push back when they are being pushed. That's what championship teams do.
For the next 3 goals you can blame Luongo if you want to (and I know a lot of people do) but that's just not being realistic. Once this Canuck team gives up a goal, and then a 2nd goal, they seem to just throw their game out the window and try to play firewagon hockey. Once they do that they are in trouble. No goalie in the league is going to stop those 3 shots. If the Hawks have figured one thing out I think it's to just randomly take shots on Roberto. Don't give Luongo any easy saves that would enable him to feel the puck and get in a zone.
While I think Cory Schneider played well (and hopefully increased his market value some more), Luongo is still starting game 6. I just hope that he finishes it. As much great work as Mike Gillis has done in building this team, as deep as they are, this team still cannot win unless Luongo is at his best.
Having said that, a little offensive push would be nice. Where are our top 6 forwards? The only valid excuse I can think of is that some awful African virus has hit the entire team. If that's the case they have a couple days now to get it out of their system. Otherwise I'm considering putting the skates on, and I can barely skate backwards.
While I generally don't believe in momentum from game to game, losing the last 2 games 12-2 I'd say without question Chicago has the momentum. The Canucks need to find a way to wrestle it back. For the first 3 games the Hawks were too easy to play against. For the last 2, it's been the Canucks who have been far too easy to play against.
Clearly the Canucks didn't miss Manny Malhotra in the first 3 games, but with the return of Dave Bolland in game 4 making the Hawks deeper at centre, there is now a hole there that they can't fill. I haven't looked at the face-off stats from game 5 but they can't be good.
Now it's up to the Canucks to find their game again and show they still have a pulse. Obviously they have to play to win but even losing by a goal in the next game would be a step in the right direction. I never thought I would ever say something like that. Their defence has to stop backing in too far and they just need to focus on winning puck battles through plain old hard work. It's not rocket science. If they put the effort in and play as a team there is a good chance they will be rewarded. Otherwise, this long and grueling road to the Stanley Cup will be cut tragically short.
Am I overstating things? Maybe slightly. The Canucks still have 2 more chances to wrap this series up. But generally speaking, this sort of thing doesn't happen to championship teams. The Canucks have completely gotten away from everything they did right in the Regular Season and the first 3 games of this series. Except for Roberto on occasion, nobody had to be spectacular. Now they are all playing an individual game. You win and you lose as a team. That's the way it's been since the beginning of time. Okay, the beginning of team sports. That's why a team like Pittsburgh, minus Crosby and Malkin, can still win games. That's how the '82 Canucks made it to the Stanley Cup final. It certainly wasn't because of talent. Maybe this Canuck squad should go back and watch some of those old tapes.
I had an uneasy feeling shortly before the first goal. Luongo likes to get some shots early and he hadn't had one to that point. He needs to make a save on that first goal. The team also needs to have a push-back shift after a goal so that they don't continue giving up 2 goals in 17 seconds or whatever it was. In fact, this team needs to push back when they are being pushed. That's what championship teams do.
For the next 3 goals you can blame Luongo if you want to (and I know a lot of people do) but that's just not being realistic. Once this Canuck team gives up a goal, and then a 2nd goal, they seem to just throw their game out the window and try to play firewagon hockey. Once they do that they are in trouble. No goalie in the league is going to stop those 3 shots. If the Hawks have figured one thing out I think it's to just randomly take shots on Roberto. Don't give Luongo any easy saves that would enable him to feel the puck and get in a zone.
While I think Cory Schneider played well (and hopefully increased his market value some more), Luongo is still starting game 6. I just hope that he finishes it. As much great work as Mike Gillis has done in building this team, as deep as they are, this team still cannot win unless Luongo is at his best.
Having said that, a little offensive push would be nice. Where are our top 6 forwards? The only valid excuse I can think of is that some awful African virus has hit the entire team. If that's the case they have a couple days now to get it out of their system. Otherwise I'm considering putting the skates on, and I can barely skate backwards.
While I generally don't believe in momentum from game to game, losing the last 2 games 12-2 I'd say without question Chicago has the momentum. The Canucks need to find a way to wrestle it back. For the first 3 games the Hawks were too easy to play against. For the last 2, it's been the Canucks who have been far too easy to play against.
Clearly the Canucks didn't miss Manny Malhotra in the first 3 games, but with the return of Dave Bolland in game 4 making the Hawks deeper at centre, there is now a hole there that they can't fill. I haven't looked at the face-off stats from game 5 but they can't be good.
Now it's up to the Canucks to find their game again and show they still have a pulse. Obviously they have to play to win but even losing by a goal in the next game would be a step in the right direction. I never thought I would ever say something like that. Their defence has to stop backing in too far and they just need to focus on winning puck battles through plain old hard work. It's not rocket science. If they put the effort in and play as a team there is a good chance they will be rewarded. Otherwise, this long and grueling road to the Stanley Cup will be cut tragically short.
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Don't Anybody PAAANNNNICCCCC!!!
I knew it wasn't going to be easy. I fully expected Chicago to come out and play great in game 4. I also expected that the Canucks would have a killer instinct that has been missing for most of 40 years. Clearly I was wrong. Why awake a sleeping giant? (Okay maybe giant is the wrong word, these aren't last years Hawks but they certainly have some confidence back). The best way to go deep in the Playoffs is to finish teams off as early as possible so you can rest. I guess you could say the Hawks NEED to win won over against the Canucks WANT to win. And it won over in a big way.
For those of you that blame Luongo for this 7-2 shellacking, you are either just trying to get attention or you are an idiot. Roberto kept the Canucks in it through the first. They were lucky to be tied after 20 minutes. And incidentally, not that it would have made much difference but Vigneault could have called a time-out at some point to try to get his team going and stop Chicago's momentum. Maybe after 2 goals in 17 seconds made it 3-1 Chicago perhaps. Again, I don't think that would have changed the outcome at all but a coaches' job is to find ways to win, find ways to turn things around when your team is struggling. You have to give credit to Chicago coach Joel Quenneville. This year he's the one with the beat up and exhausted team. You just know that with him behind the bench that 4th win is not going to be easy.
While it would probably be ridiculous of me to suggest that the refs determined the outcome of the game they certainly didn't help matters. I would love to see both of them have to sit down in front of the camera and try to explain some of their decisions. They could've put it on PPV and made a fortune. How on Earth does Duncan Keith not get a 2nd minor penalty for sticking his leg out and blatantly tripping one of our players right in front of the ref? Inexcusable. And the Ehrhoff goaltender interference penalty? After what the Canucks have endured the past two seasons with Dustin Byfuglien crashing Luongo at every turn with no calls, can we chalk this one up to a bad joke? Well 'bad' and 'joke' are two words I would use to describe the reffing in this game. I could use others, but why bother? I also thought the too many men penalty on the Canucks was ridiculous. After that I have to admit I just lost count. By the time the game was out of reach it no longer mattered. I'm not even sure who reffed this game (and that's another thing, I want their names put back on their jerseys, maybe that might make them a little more accountable!) but my ruling is that they each get a 4 game suspension. And feel shame.
Here's where I would normally tell you all that it's just one game and not to panic. Truthfully I don't care if everybody panics. If you were awake all night crying until you have no more tears left to cry. Just as long as the team doesn't overreact. They have been great all year at not getting too high and not getting too low. It's hard to continue to play at a high level when you keep winning. Bad habits tend to creep in. Maybe you start believing all the press about how good they are. Maybe they can just coast and have fun out there and still win games. Of course that's wrong. If Edmonton can prove it in back-to-back games in the regular season then you know that won't happen against a desperate Chicago team that was being embarrassed.
I fully expect the Canucks to play their best game to date in game 5. I would rather them lose 7-2 than 3-2 in OT. At least now they've gotten their wake-up call and it's time for them to respond. I'm excited to see what this team is made of. For good or for bad, we should have a much clearer idea of that tomorrow night.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Canucks Will Battle A Great Team Tonight: Themselves
The Canucks head into game one of the first round of the 2011 NHL Playoffs against the Blackhawks in great shape. They've had their most solid, most consistent regular season in their History. The numbers, the stats and the awards are well documented. I don't think I need to waste time here going over them once again. Let's just say the numbers have been astounding, and leave it at that. The Hawks on the other hand have crawled into the Playoffs, almost against their will. They played that last game against Detroit like they had already planned a fishing trip for the weekend. On paper every little stat favors the Canucks.
Having said all of that there is a reason they drop the puck. Anything can happen. Hawks' coach Joel Quenneville has the tough job of trying to figure out how to get the Canucks out of their rhythm. He's a great coach, the best coach in this series in fact, but he's got his work cut out for him. The Hawks have had to play hard for 82 games. They've had to rely on two lines and their top two defencemen for the whole season. They will continue to have to rely on them in this first round. That may be too much to ask.
Last season has been well documented and there's probably not much I can add, but the Canucks headed into that second round series against Chicago a very bruised, battered and tired team. This year it is Chicago's turn. Rookie goalie Corey Crawford has been looking tired lately. Since he's probably the third best goalie in this series I'd have to say this could be a quick demise for the Hawks.
The biggest thing to watch for tonight is how the Canucks start the game. The biggest advantage the Hawks have just might be psychologically. The Canucks need to not only realize that they are a great team but also that Hawks are a shell of their former selves. They need to play to win and not be afraid to lose. They need to play one game at a time, one shift at a time. (Damn. That's about all the cliches I can come up with, I was on a roll there.) On the other hand, Chicago doesn't give a tinker's damn that the Canucks finished first overall. (It's been a while since I've blogged, do people still say 'tinker's damn'?) They will try to make things as uncomfortable as possible and once again try to get into the Canucks' heads. I don't like their chances of doing that, but time will tell. If the Canucks can't beat the Hawks this year in the playoffs I'm not sure it will ever happen again.
There has been a lot of talk about Luongo. No surprise there. Reading some of the posts on the Blackhawks website, I was surprised to read that some of their fans think that Vancouver hasn't addressed their goaltending. The Canucks got a new, full-time goalie coach, Luongo changed his style to play deeper in the crease making it harder to run him, and we now have the best back-up goalie in the league so Luongo is FINALLY rested heading into the playoffs. I'm not sure how you could do more to address the goaltending issues. I feel very confident that Luongo will be fine. In fact better than fine. He's my Conn Smythe pick this year. (Hmm, I hope I don't jinx him.)
Speaking of jinxing, I'm going to make an effort to try not to be superstitious this year. It was getting ridiculous. I had to wear the same jersey every game, wave my Canuck flags while the anthems were sung, eat my Baked Cheezies as the puck dropped.
I could be wrong, but I don't really think the outcome of this series hinges on which type of snack I choose. Call me crazy. I definitely believe in luck. To win the Stanley Cup you need a lot of luck. But I think the players can create their own luck. I can't do that for them. That doesn't mean I'm not going to eat Baked Cheezies. I just may switch it up with Baked Ketchup Chips. It's called living on the edge people.
One thing I've always found amusing, if you go to the Canucks messageboards, or probably any teams messageboards, I always read posts like 'Let's not be too overconfident' or 'don't panic, it's just one game'. To be honest, I don't really care what the fans do. If you want to panic because Luongo let's in a shaky goal, by all means PANIC! Just as long as Luongo and the rest of the team doesn't panic. If you feel like marching through the streets of Vancouver (watch out for those hookers and junkies) after the Canucks win their first game, you go for it! I just don't want to see the Canucks spraying champagne on each other's bodies until they've won 16. Now where was I? Sorry, got distracted there.
It also occurred to me the other day that if 'we are all Canucks', then shouldn't I go and get my ring finger sized? And then I thought, they better not go chintzy. No damned cubic zirconia for me. Hey, my overconfidence isn't going to affect the outcome of this series. Haven't you been paying attention?
The playoffs are a journey. The Canucks begin that journey in a couple of hours, and they hope it's a long one. There will be a lot of sleepless nights for me and who knows what my fingernails will look like when all is said and done. I'll be the one with bandaged hands at the Parade. As nervous as I will be, it's important to appreciate how good this team is and to enjoy this journey we're about to embark on. I don't even want to think about how many losing seasons the Canucks have had. How many times they've been out of playoff contention by Christmas. How many times they've gone 0-for-January. That's all in the past. This is their time. And now it's time for them to show us what they've got. If they can win the battle against their own insecurities, it promises to be a fun ride.
My Opening Round 2011NHL Playoffs Predictions
After countless hours of research and crunching numbers, my expert team and I have FINALLY come up with our first round predictions for the 2011 NHL Playoffs. Anything short of 8 for 8 and HEADS ARE GONNA ROLL!!!
WEST:
Van (1) vs Chi (8) - Vancouver in 5
SJ (2) vs LA (7) - San Jose in 5
Det (3) vs Phoenix (6) - Detroit in 5
Ana (4) vs Nash (5) - Anaheim in 6
EAST:
Wash (1) vs NYR (8) - Washington in 7
Phil (2) vs Buff (7) - Buffalo in 6
Bos (3) vs Mtl (6) - Boston in 4
Pitt (4) vs Tam (5) - Tampa in 7
WEST:
Van (1) vs Chi (8) - Vancouver in 5
SJ (2) vs LA (7) - San Jose in 5
Det (3) vs Phoenix (6) - Detroit in 5
Ana (4) vs Nash (5) - Anaheim in 6
EAST:
Wash (1) vs NYR (8) - Washington in 7
Phil (2) vs Buff (7) - Buffalo in 6
Bos (3) vs Mtl (6) - Boston in 4
Pitt (4) vs Tam (5) - Tampa in 7
Saturday, February 26, 2011
Oscar Oscar! My 83rd Annual Academy Awards predictions.
This should normally be a very happy and exciting time for me, but if I'm being honest it isn't. I feel like a black cloud is hanging over my head. I was reading some of the headlines on Sympatico.ca and clicked on something I shouldn't have. Now I know the fat content in movie theatre popcorn and I'm not sure I will ever be able to step foot in a theatre again. At a Cineplex Odeon in Ontario they tested a large popcorn with butter. 100g of fat!! They also tested it without any topping. 67.3g of fat!!!! It's a miracle of modern science that I'm still alive! They say ignorance is bliss. I guess that will teach me for going on Sympatico.
Still, it is Oscar time. A time where millionaires and billionaires rub their fancy dresses and tight new body parts in our faces. Not literally Dad, don't go getting all excited. Well this is embarrassing. It's a time to celebrate the best in movies. A time to forget about popcorn and nutrition, (or lack thereof) and acknowledge who really did something special on the silver screen in the past year.
It's so nice to be able to say that I've seen every best picture nominee and not be bullshitting. That's something new. In fact the only movie I really wanted to see that I was unable to was Blue Valentine. Well, I guess Meet The Fockers too but I'm not sure that deserves an Oscar nomination.
As always, there were a few major snubs this year. It's hard to feel sorry for people who own jets and politicians, but I think it's a shame that a few people got overlooked. The biggest one would probably be Christopher Nolan not being nominated for Inception. I don't know what the Academy has against Mr Nolan. He always challenges the viewer and assumes they are paying attention. That's the way it should be. If you don't like it, go and watch Grownups. The other major snub for me was Tangled not being nominated for Best Animated Movie. The fact that two more movies could have been nominated but the Academy decided no movie was worthy makes me think that Walt Disney himself is probably rolling over in his freezer. Another smaller snub, I think Rabbit Hole should've been nominated for Best Picture instead of Winter's Bone.
Anne Hathaway and James Franco host this year. I'm not expecting much here, but for the love of God, just tell some good jokes. It's a long show. Hopefully some winner will make things interesting with one-armed pushups or maybe surf the crowd. Something to keep me awake in my comfy easy chair.
It's always interesting to see the outfits of the stars. Joan Rivers always asks who are you wearing? Who are you wearing? There will be a lot of Versace, Armani and Vera Wang. One of the benefits of watching from home, I get to wear Joe Boxer.
Okay, I've kept you in suspense long enough. Here are my OFFICIAL (it just looks more important when it's in all capitals) Academy Award predictions. Let your hair down, put your feet up, and enjoy.
Supporting Actor - One of the easier categories. Christian Bale for The Fighter. No question.
Supporting Actress - Not quite as easy, but I'll pick Melissa Leo also for The Fighter.
Adapted Screenplay - This is likely between True Grit and The Social Network. I'll go with Aaron Sorkin for The Social Network.
Original Screenplay - I feel pretty confident this will go to David Seidler for The King's Speech.
Original Score - It will be a crime if The Social Network doesn't win this. It sets the tone for the whole movie.
Original Song - I'll go with Coming Home from Country Strong, sung by Gwyneth Paltrow.
Animated Feature - Obviously this will go to the brilliant Toy Story 3.
Art Direction - This is tought since there were no directors named Art this year. We'll go with Eve Stewart for The King's Speech.
Cinematography - If there's any justice in the World, this should go to True Grit, pilgrim.
Costume - I just can't give anything to Alice In Wonderland. Nope. I'll say The King's Speech.
Makeup - No real standouts this year. I'll say The Wolfman.
Sound Editing - It's like sound mixing, only different. How about Inception? I mean, Inception!
Sound Mixing - This is when you take all the sounds and mix them together. Glad I could clear that up. The Social Network.
Visual Effects - This should go to Inception.
Documentary Feature - As my Mom says daily in the Vodka section of the Liquor Store, Eenie, meenie, minie moe. Wasteland.
Documentary Short - Warriors Of Quigang sounds important, and that's usually how the Academy picks. You don't think they
actually watch these movies do you?
Film Editing - I'm going to pick a dark horse. I loved the editing in Black Swan though not sure I would bet my house on it
winning. Screw it! Okay, I'll bet my house.
Foreign Film - I will give it to Biutiful, the story of a man in Spain who is a bad speller. It's TRAGIC!!
Animated Short - Again I can picture my Mom in the Liquor Store. We'll go with The Gruffalo.
Live Action Short - God Of Love. Who could vote against a movie with the word God in it? Well, maybe Bill Maher.
Director - I'm once again going to vote with my heart here. I'll pick Darren Aronofsky for the brilliant Black Swan. My finger and
toes, and eyes are crossed for him.
Actress - Natalie Portman. 'Nuff said.
Actor - I would have no problem with Jesse Eisenberg winning this, but the overwhelming favorite is Colin Firth. He was brilliant in The King's Speech and he will win the gold naked man this time around.
Picture - It was a great year for movies and there are a number of movies that could win this. True Grit, The Social Network,
Black Swan, The King's Speech and The Fighter are all in contention. Since a lot of these movies did well at the box
office you can expect some big ratings at the Oscars this year. I feel pretty confident that The King's Speech will take
the big prize this year. Although, I could be drunk.
There you go. I just saved you three and a half hours of boredom. If you still want to watch, park your behind in a VERY comfy chair and have your snacks and alcohol within arms reach. Enjoy the show and remember, We Are All Canucks! Oops, wrong blog, sorry.
Still, it is Oscar time. A time where millionaires and billionaires rub their fancy dresses and tight new body parts in our faces. Not literally Dad, don't go getting all excited. Well this is embarrassing. It's a time to celebrate the best in movies. A time to forget about popcorn and nutrition, (or lack thereof) and acknowledge who really did something special on the silver screen in the past year.
It's so nice to be able to say that I've seen every best picture nominee and not be bullshitting. That's something new. In fact the only movie I really wanted to see that I was unable to was Blue Valentine. Well, I guess Meet The Fockers too but I'm not sure that deserves an Oscar nomination.
As always, there were a few major snubs this year. It's hard to feel sorry for people who own jets and politicians, but I think it's a shame that a few people got overlooked. The biggest one would probably be Christopher Nolan not being nominated for Inception. I don't know what the Academy has against Mr Nolan. He always challenges the viewer and assumes they are paying attention. That's the way it should be. If you don't like it, go and watch Grownups. The other major snub for me was Tangled not being nominated for Best Animated Movie. The fact that two more movies could have been nominated but the Academy decided no movie was worthy makes me think that Walt Disney himself is probably rolling over in his freezer. Another smaller snub, I think Rabbit Hole should've been nominated for Best Picture instead of Winter's Bone.
Anne Hathaway and James Franco host this year. I'm not expecting much here, but for the love of God, just tell some good jokes. It's a long show. Hopefully some winner will make things interesting with one-armed pushups or maybe surf the crowd. Something to keep me awake in my comfy easy chair.
It's always interesting to see the outfits of the stars. Joan Rivers always asks who are you wearing? Who are you wearing? There will be a lot of Versace, Armani and Vera Wang. One of the benefits of watching from home, I get to wear Joe Boxer.
Okay, I've kept you in suspense long enough. Here are my OFFICIAL (it just looks more important when it's in all capitals) Academy Award predictions. Let your hair down, put your feet up, and enjoy.
Supporting Actor - One of the easier categories. Christian Bale for The Fighter. No question.
Supporting Actress - Not quite as easy, but I'll pick Melissa Leo also for The Fighter.
Adapted Screenplay - This is likely between True Grit and The Social Network. I'll go with Aaron Sorkin for The Social Network.
Original Screenplay - I feel pretty confident this will go to David Seidler for The King's Speech.
Original Score - It will be a crime if The Social Network doesn't win this. It sets the tone for the whole movie.
Original Song - I'll go with Coming Home from Country Strong, sung by Gwyneth Paltrow.
Animated Feature - Obviously this will go to the brilliant Toy Story 3.
Art Direction - This is tought since there were no directors named Art this year. We'll go with Eve Stewart for The King's Speech.
Cinematography - If there's any justice in the World, this should go to True Grit, pilgrim.
Costume - I just can't give anything to Alice In Wonderland. Nope. I'll say The King's Speech.
Makeup - No real standouts this year. I'll say The Wolfman.
Sound Editing - It's like sound mixing, only different. How about Inception? I mean, Inception!
Sound Mixing - This is when you take all the sounds and mix them together. Glad I could clear that up. The Social Network.
Visual Effects - This should go to Inception.
Documentary Feature - As my Mom says daily in the Vodka section of the Liquor Store, Eenie, meenie, minie moe. Wasteland.
Documentary Short - Warriors Of Quigang sounds important, and that's usually how the Academy picks. You don't think they
actually watch these movies do you?
Film Editing - I'm going to pick a dark horse. I loved the editing in Black Swan though not sure I would bet my house on it
winning. Screw it! Okay, I'll bet my house.
Foreign Film - I will give it to Biutiful, the story of a man in Spain who is a bad speller. It's TRAGIC!!
Animated Short - Again I can picture my Mom in the Liquor Store. We'll go with The Gruffalo.
Live Action Short - God Of Love. Who could vote against a movie with the word God in it? Well, maybe Bill Maher.
Director - I'm once again going to vote with my heart here. I'll pick Darren Aronofsky for the brilliant Black Swan. My finger and
toes, and eyes are crossed for him.
Actress - Natalie Portman. 'Nuff said.
Actor - I would have no problem with Jesse Eisenberg winning this, but the overwhelming favorite is Colin Firth. He was brilliant in The King's Speech and he will win the gold naked man this time around.
Picture - It was a great year for movies and there are a number of movies that could win this. True Grit, The Social Network,
Black Swan, The King's Speech and The Fighter are all in contention. Since a lot of these movies did well at the box
office you can expect some big ratings at the Oscars this year. I feel pretty confident that The King's Speech will take
the big prize this year. Although, I could be drunk.
There you go. I just saved you three and a half hours of boredom. If you still want to watch, park your behind in a VERY comfy chair and have your snacks and alcohol within arms reach. Enjoy the show and remember, We Are All Canucks! Oops, wrong blog, sorry.
Corey's Favorite Songs Of 2010
As I mentioned in my last blog, the album is what matters to me. I would take 12 non-hooky, non-commercial, but solid songs over Kesha's, sorry K$sha's Greatest Hits any day of the week. Having said that, I did promise to release my favorite songs of the year, and here they are, only 2 months late. You've all seen the Grammy Awards, here now are the Grampy Awards. (Hey, I'm no spring chicken.)
I have quite a few favorite songs. Some were on the radio. A lot were not. I will list the majority of them in no particular order and then follow that up with my top 10 along with a brief lame comment about each. Following that, I will post a list of Best Album honorable mentions. Read. Enjoy! Rinse, and repeat.
Kings Of Leon - Mary, The Face; Kanye West - Dark Fantasy; Gary Allan - Today; Ray Lamontagne - God Willin' And The Creek Don't Rise, New York City's Killin' Me; Band Of Horses - Older, Compliments; Melissa Etheridge - Indiana, Drag Me Away; John Legend & The Roots - Hard Times, I Wish I Knew How It Would Feel To Be Free; Scissor Sisters - Whole New Way; Tom Petty - Good Enough; Vampire Weekend - Cousins, I Think Ur A Contra; Ryan Bingham - The Weary Kind; Elton John/Leon Russell - When Love Is Dying, $800 Shoes; Justin Townes Earl - Harlem River Blues; Johnny Reid - Today I'm Going To Try And Change The World; MGMT - Congratulations; The National - Blood Buzz Ohio, Runaway; Sarah McLaughlin - Loving You Is Easy; Eric Clapton/Sheryl Crow - Diamonds Made From Rain; Josh Groban - Hidden Away; Jakob Dylan - Nothing But The Whole Wide World; Robert Plant - Angel Dance; Enrique Iglesias - I Like It; Flo Rida - The Club Can't Handle Me. (I told you there were a lot.)
Now for my illustrious TOP 10 (and yes, all these artists will have to pass a drug test to officially be elligible for their Grampy):
10. Colder Weather - Zac Brown Band -- A slow song with great harmonies. Sounds like the Eagles meets Lynnyrd Skynnyrd or
however the Hell you spell it. I love singing along in the car to this one, Ryan, not so
much.
9. Born Free - Kid Rock -- A great driving in the sunshine while talking on the phone and looking for a hooker and a dealer
song. At least that's the way Charlie Sheen described it.
8. Wavin' Flag - K'Naan -- This is a great song with a catchy chorus and a positive message.
7. Airplanes - B.O.B (Featuring Hayley Williams) -- A very catchy, very radio-friendly song. Rihanna did a great version live.
6. Need You Now - Lady Antebellum -- Here's a song that crossed over into Pop. Some great vocals and a great piano hook
that even I could probably play.
5. Love The Way You Lie - Eminem/Rihanna -- Just a great song. Rihanna's voice was perfect. In fact, I prefer the second part of
this song which is the last track on Rihanna's new album Loud.
4. Hey Soul Sister - Train -- This blockbuster of a song made Train relevant once again and perhaps more importantly they will
never again be thought of as a one hit wonder.
3. Just The Way You Are - Bruno Mars -- Is there a star rising faster than Bruno Mars right now? The sky is the limit for this
young Hawaiian, and this is the song that started it all.
2. Runaway - Kanye West -- My favorite song on what I thought was the best album of the year. He almost dares radio stations
to play him. It's strange, it's odd, yet it's ridiculously catchy. And I have to like any song with
'douche bag' in it.
1. F*&K You - Cee Lo Green -- What a great song, and at the Grammy's he performed it with Muppets. How cool is that?! (One
of them even resembled Gwyneth Paltrow.) Of course the single was called 'Forget You' and
unfortunately it's not on the album. This to me was the catchiest song of the year.
Albums Of The Year (Honorable Mentions, in no particular order):
Sarah McLaughlin - Laws Of Illusion
Lady Antebellum - Need You Now
Eric Clapton - Clapton
Scissor Sisters - Night Work
Gary Allan - Get Off On The Pain
Jacob Dylan - Women & Country
Eminem - Recovery
John Mellencamp - No Better Than This
This concludes the Grampy Awards. Thank you all for coming! Drive safe.
I have quite a few favorite songs. Some were on the radio. A lot were not. I will list the majority of them in no particular order and then follow that up with my top 10 along with a brief lame comment about each. Following that, I will post a list of Best Album honorable mentions. Read. Enjoy! Rinse, and repeat.
Kings Of Leon - Mary, The Face; Kanye West - Dark Fantasy; Gary Allan - Today; Ray Lamontagne - God Willin' And The Creek Don't Rise, New York City's Killin' Me; Band Of Horses - Older, Compliments; Melissa Etheridge - Indiana, Drag Me Away; John Legend & The Roots - Hard Times, I Wish I Knew How It Would Feel To Be Free; Scissor Sisters - Whole New Way; Tom Petty - Good Enough; Vampire Weekend - Cousins, I Think Ur A Contra; Ryan Bingham - The Weary Kind; Elton John/Leon Russell - When Love Is Dying, $800 Shoes; Justin Townes Earl - Harlem River Blues; Johnny Reid - Today I'm Going To Try And Change The World; MGMT - Congratulations; The National - Blood Buzz Ohio, Runaway; Sarah McLaughlin - Loving You Is Easy; Eric Clapton/Sheryl Crow - Diamonds Made From Rain; Josh Groban - Hidden Away; Jakob Dylan - Nothing But The Whole Wide World; Robert Plant - Angel Dance; Enrique Iglesias - I Like It; Flo Rida - The Club Can't Handle Me. (I told you there were a lot.)
Now for my illustrious TOP 10 (and yes, all these artists will have to pass a drug test to officially be elligible for their Grampy):
10. Colder Weather - Zac Brown Band -- A slow song with great harmonies. Sounds like the Eagles meets Lynnyrd Skynnyrd or
however the Hell you spell it. I love singing along in the car to this one, Ryan, not so
much.
9. Born Free - Kid Rock -- A great driving in the sunshine while talking on the phone and looking for a hooker and a dealer
song. At least that's the way Charlie Sheen described it.
8. Wavin' Flag - K'Naan -- This is a great song with a catchy chorus and a positive message.
7. Airplanes - B.O.B (Featuring Hayley Williams) -- A very catchy, very radio-friendly song. Rihanna did a great version live.
6. Need You Now - Lady Antebellum -- Here's a song that crossed over into Pop. Some great vocals and a great piano hook
that even I could probably play.
5. Love The Way You Lie - Eminem/Rihanna -- Just a great song. Rihanna's voice was perfect. In fact, I prefer the second part of
this song which is the last track on Rihanna's new album Loud.
4. Hey Soul Sister - Train -- This blockbuster of a song made Train relevant once again and perhaps more importantly they will
never again be thought of as a one hit wonder.
3. Just The Way You Are - Bruno Mars -- Is there a star rising faster than Bruno Mars right now? The sky is the limit for this
young Hawaiian, and this is the song that started it all.
2. Runaway - Kanye West -- My favorite song on what I thought was the best album of the year. He almost dares radio stations
to play him. It's strange, it's odd, yet it's ridiculously catchy. And I have to like any song with
'douche bag' in it.
1. F*&K You - Cee Lo Green -- What a great song, and at the Grammy's he performed it with Muppets. How cool is that?! (One
of them even resembled Gwyneth Paltrow.) Of course the single was called 'Forget You' and
unfortunately it's not on the album. This to me was the catchiest song of the year.
Albums Of The Year (Honorable Mentions, in no particular order):
Sarah McLaughlin - Laws Of Illusion
Lady Antebellum - Need You Now
Eric Clapton - Clapton
Scissor Sisters - Night Work
Gary Allan - Get Off On The Pain
Jacob Dylan - Women & Country
Eminem - Recovery
John Mellencamp - No Better Than This
This concludes the Grampy Awards. Thank you all for coming! Drive safe.
Saturday, January 1, 2011
Corey's Top 20 List Of 2010's Best Albums
In the days of itunes and top 40 radio, it seems as if the album is no longer important. Well it is to me, and I'm relieved to know that I'm not alone. Call me old-fashioned but when I put an album on I listen to it from beginning to end. I don't skip a slow song or fast-forward to the chorus. Maybe it's because I come from the days of cassette tape when it was just too much work to move ahead to the next song. To me a great CD is one that makes me feel. It can make me laugh, or even cry. It can make me tap my foot or sing along. It can make me play the air drums against my steering wheel while other drivers watch and shake their heads. It can make me not care that others are watching me, shaking their heads. It can make me feel alive. It can cause me to get a speeding ticket. (Thanks for nothing Zac Brown.) It just needs to make me feel SOMETHING.
I'm looking for cohesive albums that take me someplace. When I close my eyes I want to be transported to a beach in Tahiti or a protest rally in the '60's, if only for a few minutes. To those of you who say music sucks nowadays, this list is for you. While there are some good songs on the radio, most of it is boring and unambitious to me. I'm here to tell you that music is better than ever and I'm confident that this list will back me up.
For the record I should point out that I'm an unhip middle-aged white guy who may try to impress you with some hip words. I may even try to convince you that I am knowledgeable when it comes to music. Don't believe a word.
20. THE NATIONAL - HIGH VIOLET
Indie band The National, featuring baritone lead singer Matt Berninger, have struck gold with High Violet. It's probably unlike anything you will hear elsewhere. Matt is the Leonard Cohen of the new generation, without the assholishness. Since it's very unique it may take a few listens to get into it, but the hooky dominant alt chords of the acoustic guitar and the syncopated trance-like cowbell is stunning. Yeah, that's the ticket. The album really takes off at the midway point with Bloodbuzz Ohio.
Where it takes me: Atop Mt Everest with a Tibetan monk, or maybe just atop a Tibetan monk in a sleazy motel room.
Other key tracks: Runaway, Lemonworld, Sorrow
19. Mumford & Sons - Sigh No More
Mumford & Sons may sound like a clothing store or a '70's sitcom, but they are in fact a great new band. They have an acoustic almost Maritimes folkie sound. You could call them old souls in young bodies except that sounds dirty. It's great, relaxing listening. In 'Little Lion Man' they sing "I really fucked it up this time." Anyone who admits to that deserves at least some recognition. 'Timshell' is a beautiful song about the little baby Jesus. Well either that or Rene Charles.
Where it takes me: To a small bar in Newfoundland having a pint with the laddies. Noo doot aboot it!
Other key tracks: Winter Winds, Awake My Soul, I Gave You All
18. Train - Save Me, San Francisco
Veteran rock band Train never quite equalled the success of their smash hit 'Drops Of Jupiter'. Until now. With 'Hey, Soul Sister' the band has rejuvenated itself. Full of catchy tunes and heartfelt singalongs, Save Me, San Francisco will put a glow in your heart and a lump in your pants.
Where it takes me: Fisherman's Wharf on a sunny day, with the birds, the tourists and the transvestites.
Other key tracks: Title track, Marry Me, Words
17. Tom Petty - Mojo
Tom Petty's got his mojo back. His best album since Sarah Palin was failing High School, Mojo rocks. There are no pretty ballads on here. I mean, let's face it, he makes Bob Dylan sound like Josh Groban. He has a great band and they are all in fine form on songs like 'The Trip To Pirates Cove' and 'Good Enough'. I think all music sounds better with an ipod (shameless product-placement), but this is especially true for Mojo. Well done Mr Petty, now go sit down before you break a hip.
WITM: Graceland (before Elvis died on the shitter.)
OKT: Jefferson Jericho Blues, Don't Pull Me Over
16. Sheryl Crow - 100 Miles From Memphis
Sheryl Crow's new album is all about Motown. It starts with the high tempo'd 'Our Love Is Fading' and ends with a Jackson 5 cover that you'd swear is Michael Jackson himself. I guess you could say that Ms Crow is a darker skinned Michael Jackson with a bigger nose. It's funky. It's soulful. It'll make you want to take off your underwear and throw it on her. Hopefully it doesn't stick.
WITM: Motown in the '50's and '60's. Maybe one of Gladys Knight's Pips.
OKT: 100 Miles From Memphis, Eye To Eye
15. The Black Keys - Brothers
While I call this band American alt-blues rock, I don't really know how to describe this album, so I'll just do what I always do. Use big words that don't mean anything to impress people with my 'brilliance'. Let's see. Dan and Patrick, the two members of The Black Keys, create a visceral and dynamic panacologue of archipelagic chronyism. This album is inscendiary. Actually this album has a really cool vibe to it with some interesting distorted vocals.
WITM: A blues club in New Orleans after too much Bourbon and a hit of LSD. Okay, two hits of LSD.
Key tracks: Tighten Up, Howlin' For You, These Days
14. Zac Brown - You Get What You Give
Now we're talkin'. The Zac Brown Band is the Lynyrd Skynyrd of our generation. Maybe throw in some Eagles while you're at it. They have been known lately for doing four hour shows and all seven members are brilliant musicians. 'Colder Weather' is probably the best track on here with some great old school harmonies. I can't help but sing along to that one. Jimmy Buffet and Alan Jackson make guest appearances but to me Zac Brown is as much souther rock as they are country, combined with a whole lot of soul.
WITM: Livin' it up at the Hotel California. (Such a lovely place.)
OKT: Let It Go, I Play The Road, Quiet Your Mind
13. Arcade Fire - The Suburbs
Montreal indie rockers Arcade Fire made a great album in 2010. The Suburbs contains some heavy, guitar-driven songs as well as some slower, reflective piano based tunes. They play a lot of instruments, including the Hurdy-Gurdy. I'm not sure what that is, but it's fun to say. Hurdy-Gurdy. They are good enough to be playing stadiums now, and maybe one day they'll fill them.
WITM: On a roller coaster journey, but not a lame coaster. A cool roller coaster with like loop-de-loops and stuff.
Key tracks: title track, Empty Room, Month Of May
12. Drake - Thank Me Later
I don't know much about rap yo, (did I mention I'm a middle-aged white guy?) but this is Drake's debut album and it features Alicia Keys, Nicky Minaj, T.I., Jay-Z, Lil Wayne and Kanye (he co-wrote a song). All of that and the fact that listening to these songs makes me want to wear a Mercedes logo around my neck, get a .357 Magnum tattoo, a gold tooth and find a crack ho to punch in the face makes this album worthy of my list.
WITM: The ghettos of Harlem, or Robson Street in Vancouver on a Friday night.
Key tracks: Fireworks, Over
11. Melissa Etheridge - Fearless Love
Artist, musician, humanitarian Melissa Etheridge is as good as ever on Fearless Love. This album is like having twelve children. How could I possibly pick a favorite? 'Indiana' is a piano-driven song with heartbreaking lyrics. It builds and it builds until it explodes. 'Drag Me Away' deals with her Cancer, or more accurately, about her fighting back and refusing to give up. It's powerful stuff and it rocks. Some songs have such great melodies that they don't even need music. 'Company' is one of those songs. Melissa could start it a capella and her great crowd would likely finish it for her.
WITM: Dairy Queen eating a Pumpkin Pie Blizzard. I couldn't pay it a bigger compliment.
OKT: The Wanting Of You, Miss California, We Are The Ones
10. Bruno Mars - Doo Wops & Hooligans
Bruno Mars seemed to come from nowhere. He's had a couple smash hits and won a few awards, but is there any greater accolade than making my top 10? I think not. Bruno has a silky-smooth yet distinctive voice, he has the look of a star and a great debut album. (And B.O.B.'s your Uncle.) 'Just The Way You Are' was all over the radio and one of the best songs of the year. Lead track 'Grenade' is also on its way up the charts. He's my pick this year to be the next big superstar. (Past picks- Michael Buble, Lady Gaga and Milli Vanilli. Hey, two out of three ain't bad.)
WITM: On a luau on some tropical Hawaiian island featuring hula dancers with big coconuts.
OKT: The Lazy Song, Marry You
9. Kings Of Leon - Come Around Sundown
Who would put a song called 'The End' as the lead track? The Kings Of Leon, that's who. These guys are well on their way to becoming the biggest band in America, if Pigeons with diarrhea don't stand in their way. 'Mary' has a cool vibe to it. It has some fine background vocals and it's the one song that stood out to me on first listen. 'The Face' is a great mid-tempo song with some cool vocals. These guys have created a very ambitious album with some pop, some rock, some country. Really everything except Polka. It all works very well.
WITM: On my Grandma's front porch with a guy playing a banjo that has more strings than he has teeth.
OKT: The End, Back Down South
8. Kid Rock - Born Free
On the cover, Kid Rock is sitting in the back of a convertible, feet up on the seats, in a wheat field. The visual you get from that photo perfectly sums up this album. I call it a driving album, or more accurately a speeding album. You could also call it the lost Bob Seger album. Mr Seger even plays piano on one track. The title track is a career song for Kid Rock and it will make you want to outrun the Smokeys that are likely to be chasing you should you listen to this while driving. (Do they still call them Smokeys?)
WITM: Outrunning the Smokeys! Weren't you paying attention?
OKT: Care, Collide
7. Justin Townes Earl - Harlem River Blues
Steve Earl's son sounds a lot like his Dad, and he has just as much soul. This album would fit right in on Oh Brother Where Art Thou? It never strays from that old bluesy sound. The title track got my attention instantly. And there's even a Gospel Choir. How can it not make my list? Praise Jesus!
WITM: Death row in a Mississippi prison.
OKT: One More Night In Brooklyn, Learning To Cry
6. John Legend & The Roots - Wake Up
This album, consisting of '60's protest songs, just might be the most important album of the year. The fact that these songs are still relevant today tells us that we still haven't learned from our mistakes. (Wow, that was deep!) I don't know much about The Roots besides the fact that they are WAAAY too good for Jimmy Fallon. Mr Legend and The Roots are a perfect match on Wake Up and I can't help but feel I'm listening to a key moment in history, as well as brilliant music from beginning to end.
WITM: On a bus in the '50's with Rosa Parks, or egging BC Premier Gordon Campbell's house to protest the HST.
Key tracks: Hard Times, I Wish I Knew How It Would Feel To Be Free
5. Ray Lamontagne And The Pariah Dogs - God Willin' & The Creek Don't Rise
A very similar album to Justin Townes Earl, but perhaps a little more ambitious with a more dynamic vocal. The title track is one of my favorite songs of the year. This album is exactly why God invented the tape recorder. (Allegedly.)
WITM: To another dimension in which I'm no longer an overweight balding middle-aged man.
OKT: Repo Man, New York City's Killing Me
4. Band Of Horses - Infinite Arms
Infinite Arms has kind of an '80's vibe to it. It's very melodic, with some great harmonies and it's also quite unique. By my second listen I was hooked. I've probably listened to this album as much as any in the past twelve months. 'Older' is a solid, radio-friendly song that is fun to sing along to. (In key? Optional.) On 'Compliments' they sing 'Is there a God up in the air?' When I listen to this album, it makes me think that there just might be. (But then I think about the Platypus and wonder what 'God' would've created that?)
WITM: To an Allman Brothers concert in the '70's. Mushrooms optional.
OKT: Factory, Laredo
3. Vampire Weekend - Contra
I'd heard great things about Contra, and I must admit, when I bought it (Yes I buy ALL my music. I'm a firm believer in giving these often brilliant artists money so that they can continue to create more great music.) I did not like it at all. I only gave it another listen because so many critics raved about it. On second listen I loved it. It's almost like my brain needed a chance to process their unique sound. Take one part Paul Simon and one part bi-polar, World music, schizophrenic guy who plays 85 different instruments, and you've got Vampire Weekend. I listened to this album many times this year. I sang along. I played air guitar. I air drummed. I even air Zabumba'd. 'Cousins' is a great, radio-friendly rock song, and while listening to the final track 'I Think Ur A Contra' , I got the feeling there was something almost Beatlesque going on. Very cool.
WITM: On a musical journey from a beach in Jamaica, to an African village along a Crocodile-infested river, to a Shakira concert in a Buenos Aires stadium.
OKT: Horchata, Holiday, Diplomat's Son, Giving Up The Gun
2. Elton John/Leon Russell - The Union
To me there is a pretty big gap between the first eighteen albums on this list and the final two. When I first heard this album I felt that this was the next big Grammy winner. Recently it got bumped down to second but we'll get to that in a minute. (I can hear Jerry Seinfeld saying 'of all the losers, you came in first' in my head.) This is Elton John's attempt to resurrect the career of the long forgotten music legend Leon Russell. Add producer T. Bone Burnett to the mix and the results are magical. As great as the first half of this album is, the second half is where it really takes off. 'When Love Is Dying' is a great ballad and one of my favorite songs of the year. This is some of Elton's best work in years. These two pianists compliment each other very well with their different styles. (I hope there wasn't any pianist envy going on.) I think that clearly this union has brought out the best in both of them.
WITM: Back to a time when radio didn't play garbage; when image wasn't the single most important thing.
OKT: If It Wasn't For Bad, Eight Hundred Dollar Shoes, In The Hands Of Angels
1. Kanye West - My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy
I am not a Kanye West fan. It breaks my heart to put him atop this distinguished list. He's arrogant, out-spoken and annoying. But he's also brilliant, and he knows it. The opening track 'Dark Fantasy' is a key track because it tells the listener right away that this is no ordinary album. It's a song that I think only Kanye could've created. Following that is song after song of some of the most ambitious, unique music you will ever come across. The best song of the bunch is a stunner called 'Runaway'. In it he sings 'This is for the douchebags, this is for the assholes.' Could he be singing to himself? Kanye challenges every artist to be better, to be more ambitious. I hope more artists (the ones not on this list) will step up to the plate.
WITM: On an epic journey through time and space. Or in the line-up at the McDonald's drive-thru.
OKT: Power, All Of The Lights, Monster, Blame Game
I hope you liked my Top 20 List Of 2010's Best Albums. Now go out and BUY some of these and enjoy your journey. If you have a problem with my list, then get off your lazy ass and write your own damn list!
Tomorrow I will list my favorite songs of the year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)